Proofpane is an AI-governance layer: every AI call your team makes — coding agents, workflow platforms, direct API — is policy-gated before execution, hash-chained after every step, and exported as an Ed25519-signed Evidence Pack an auditor verifies offline. This page exists because a governance product should hold itself to its own standard: claims tied to evidence, not asserted. Every major claim below is mapped to how you can check it — and we label the honest verifiability tier of each, including the ones you can only see in the demo or that are still stage-gated.
Last updated 2026-07-25 · [email protected]
| Claim | How to check it yourself | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence Pack is tamper-evident & verifiable offline | Download the real signed pack + the standalone verifier, run it (no network, no account), then flip one byte and watch it fail: /evidence/sample-pack/ — or, from an allowlist-only sandbox, the GitHub mirror | VERIFY NOW |
| Ed25519 signature + SHA-256 hash chain | The verifier re-computes the manifest signature, all file hashes, and the whole chain — the captured PASS output and the verifier source are on the same page: sample pack | VERIFY NOW |
| Provenance, not just integrity — a self-consistent forgery is caught | We publish the signing key out-of-band from the pack; verify_evidence_pack.py --pubkey signing-key.pem pins it, so a pack rebuilt around a forger’s own key is rejected. Rebuild it yourself and watch it fail — plus the honest boundary (external anchoring is roadmap): integrity vs provenance |
VERIFY NOW |
| The standard we’re judged by is public, versioned & citable | The full reference architecture (six invariants, seven planes, L1–L3 conformance ladder) is published under CC BY 4.0 at /architecture/, archived at github.com/Proofpane/architecture, and citable via DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21402331 — a private rubric can’t back an auditability claim | VERIFY NOW |
| ~1,800 governed calls/second across three nodes, chain still valid | Download the exact k6 load-test script and run it against your own rig — method + numbers below. proofpane-loadtest-k6.js | REPRODUCE |
| DLP redacts secrets before the model sees them | Watch five AI tools read a secret file — the AWS key comes back redacted before any model sees it: /demos (govern-tools walkthrough, captured live) | SEE IT |
| Policy gate denies / pauses risky actions before execution | On camera: a menu-bar tray fires an Approve/Deny checkpoint before a tool call runs — /demos; or trigger it yourself in the no-signup demo | SEE IT |
| 335 controls across NIST AI RMF · ISO 42001 · EU AI Act · GDPR · SOC 2 | Browse the control catalogue and per-skill mappings in the demo org: app.proofpane.com/login?demo=1 → Compliance | IN THE DEMO |
| Cost metered at one choke point, reconciled 1:1 vs vendor invoice | Open the usage ledger + reconciliation view in the demo org: demo → Billing / Usage | IN THE DEMO |
| Every run is a replayable audit tree with full lineage | Open any agent run in the demo org and expand the tree — each tool call, policy decision, token and dollar: demo → Agent runs | IN THE DEMO |
| Per-client coverage depth (gate+transform / gate-only / observe) | The full honest coverage matrix — including the column of what we deliberately can't reach — is on the homepage’s deep-dive and in vs GRC & logs | PUBLISHED |
| Security posture (data flow, encryption, tenant isolation, roadmap) | Plain-text, item-by-item: the current distributed macOS daemon and the public Tray v0.3.9 macOS DMG and MDM installer package carry Apple signing/notarisation evidence; the desktop CI build remains separately labelled from public distribution; SOC 2, a third-party pen test and Windows Authenticode remain roadmap — macOS signing is done, it is the Windows half that is outstanding: Trust Center | PUBLISHED |
BASE_URL=https://your-deployment DEVICE_ID=<id> TOKEN=<device-token> \ MODE=perf TARGET=mcp_event TARGET_RPS=1800 DURATION=80s \ k6 run proofpane-loadtest-k6.js
Numbers scale with hardware; a single node holds a lower rate. We publish the ceilings and the trade-offs (latency vs throughput, the lock-convoy vs decoupled-sealer story) rather than a single hero figure — ask for the perf notes if you want the full methodology.
Found a claim on the site without a row here? Email [email protected] — it either gets an evidence link or gets cut.